Calendar
During the fall 2018 semester, the Computational Social Science (CSS) and the Computational Sciences and Informatics (CSI) Programs have merged their seminar/colloquium series where students, faculty and guest speakers present their latest research. These seminars are free and are open to the public. This series takes place on Fridays from 3-4:30 in Center for Social Complexity Suite which is located on the third floor of Research Hall.
If you would like to join the seminar mailing list please email Karen Underwood.
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
Neil Johnson
Professor of Physics
George Washington University
Slaying the Online Hydra of Hate, Distrust and anti-Science
Friday, October 11, 2019 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.
[2] N.F. Johnson et al., New online ecology of adversarial aggregates: ISIS and beyond, Science 352, 1459 (2016)
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
Fahad Aloraini
CSS PhD student
Modeling Solar-Panel Technology adoption in Austin: a test of the power of integrating GIS and Cognitive modeling.
Friday, October 18, 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.
Joint CDS, Math, and Physics Seminar
Mason Porter
Mathematics Professor
University of California, Los Angeles
Topological Data Analysis of Spatial Complex Systems
Thursday, October 24, 1:00 p.m.
Exploratory Hall, Room 3301, Fairfax Campus
All are welcome to attend.
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
Katherine Anderson
Visiting Assistant Professor
Department of Informatics and Networked Systems
School of Computing and Information
University of Pittsburgh
Friday, October 25, 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
Robert Axtell
Professor Computational Social Science PhD Program
Department of Computational and Data Sciences
George Mason University
Working with Heavy-Tailed Data: A Tutorial
Friday, November 01, 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
John Schuler
PhD Student
Department of Economics
George Mason University
The Econometrics of Prices in a Network Economy
Friday, November 08, 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
Dr. Seth Brown
Steam Solution LLC
National Municipal Stormwater Alliance
To Be or Not To Be: Introducing the Green Stormwater Infrastructure Social Spatial Adoption (G-SSA) Model
Friday, November 15, 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.
The use of incentives in stormwater programs is a common feature that is used to motivate private property owners as well as land developers to adopt specific types of stormwater management infrastructure at the site or parcel level. While incentives for land developers, such as reduced plan review time or reduced plan review fee for projects that utilize specific BMPs, such as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI), are helpful policies in driving implementation of innovative stormwater practices, this implementation is limited to land development activity. Approximately 75% of existing impervious cover is associated with land development activities that took place prior to federal legislation focused on urban stormwater runoff. The implication of this is that a majority of impervious cover across the U.S. discharges runoff that is either inadequately managed or not managed at all. Until we address these existing areas, impacts from these areas will continue to impact our waters. This is reflected by evolving regulations that require a certain amount of existing impervious cover to be retrofitted to provide stormwater management. Many cities, such as Milwaukee, Seattle and Atlanta, also have retention volume goals as part of a regulatory program as well as an effort to increase the resilience and sustainability of urban areas.
The motivation to retrofit existing impervious areas is a driver to retrofit both public and private lands. Public rights-of-way (ROWs) are often challenging to work within, and there is a limited amount of public ROW available. Overall, 60% of land in the U.S. is privately held, with large portions of these areas located in large public parks in Mountain Region states. The result is that many states have private land ownership rates at 80% or higher; clearly this is a need to find ways to locate urban stormwater retrofits on private lands.
The default method of incentivizing private land owners to adopt onsite stormwater infrastructure is a stormwater fee reduction according to the 2018 Black and Veatch Stormwater Utility Survey. The limitation with this approach comes in when a community does not have a stormwater utility established, which is the case for at least 2/3 of the regulated stormwater entities in the country. And even if a utility exists, the fees are often not high enough to make economic sense for onsite adoption when considering payback periods and other financial metrics. The reason for this is simple – stormwater utility fees are set at a level/rate to pay for needed stormwater programmatic and implementation rather than to create an effective financial incentive for private parcel owners to adopt BMPs onsite. The result of this are participation rates in incentive-based stormwater infrastructure on-site investments of 2-5% or lower associated with traditional incentive programs, which also include cost-sharing and subsidy programs as well. Due to this reason, communities are considering market-based approaches, such as stormwater credit trading, that can reward private property owners in a more robust way for onsite BMP adoption.
While market-based programs hold much promise, the focus of research in this area has been (rightly) on program architecture and policies with the view of “if we build it, they will come”. However, this leaves a void in understanding on how parcel owners will respond to market-based option. Questions regarding the motivations for adoption, how decisions on adoption are made, and how adoption on parcels affect adoptions in neighboring areas or parcels. This presentation will outline research done to begin to address the “consumer behavior” view of BMP adoption. Specifically, a socio-economic model based upon cellular automata-style agent-based modeling will be presented to illustrate a method to capture the adoption of GSI across multiple urban neighborhoods that comprise a city-wide landscape.
This model – the Green Stormwater Infrastructure Social Spatial Adoption (G-SSA) model – provides insights on neighboring effects, spatial dynamics, and decision-making aspects of GSI adoption based upon social theory. Model sensitivity analysis highlights the significance of social and spatial model elements to overall GSI adoption rates and pattern. An applied G-SSA model has been developed and explored to simulate the complex emergent patterns for GSI adoption across a specific cityscape (Washington, D.C.). Applied G-SSA model output is consistent with expected model behavior as well as observed and document GSI adoption patterns in Washington, D.C.
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
Dr. Mahdi Hashemi
Assistant Professor
Department of Information Sciences and Technology
George Mason University
Machine learning for smart cities
Friday, November 22, 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.
Cities are growing physically and digitally, faster than ever. The ever-growing population of cities, along with their intrinsic inaccessibility and inequity, has created difficulties with traffic, mobility, safety, health, pollution, and misinformation among many others. The physical and digital growth of cities outpaces the effort to address the aforementioned issues.
The growing popularity of online social networks (OSN) and World Wide Web (WWW) has remarkably expedited the information dissemination among individuals and groups. Digital data is the lifeblood of modern cities. Today, it’s being captured in large quantities at unprecedented rates via ubiquitous devices and sensors. Unfortunately, most of the generated data is wasted without extracting potentially useful information and knowledge because of the lack of established mechanisms that benefit from the availability of such data. That has turned the discussion from how the massive amounts of data are collected to how knowledge can be extracted from them.
Smart cities become smart not only because they automate routine functions serving the citizens, buildings, and traffic systems but also because they enable monitoring, understanding, analyzing and planning the city to improve the efficiency, equity, and quality of life for its citizens in real time. With physical and digital problems on one hand and big data on the other, smart cities strive to juxtapose them to find inexpensive solutions. How the digital data should be processed to help solve problems in cities remains one of the major areas of research and development in recent years and the focus of this talk
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
Eileen Young
PhD Student
Disaster Science and Management Program
University of Delaware
PrioritEvac: An Agent-Based Model (ABM) For Examining Social Factors of Building Fire Evacuation
Friday, December 06, 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.
Research Colloquium on Computational Social Science/Data Science
Ben Clemans PhD
TBA
Friday, January 24, 3:00 p.m.
Center for Social Complexity Suite, 3rd Floor Research Hall
All are welcome to attend.